SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Apple Inc.
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
213239 942 6 AAPL
Emcee:  clean86 Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the Apple Inc. board on SI. This thread is moderated. If you wish to participate here, please read at least the first two sections below.

RULES

The basic rule is that all participants must be polite to each other. Try to imagine that you are sitting in a living room with everyone else. Don't say anything you wouldn't say in that situation.

No name calling. Disagree with another person's words all you want, but don't insult the person.

Due to SI policy, political comments are off limits here, unless there is an issue that specifically affects Apple. See below for a bit more about this if you care.

It's all about having a civil discussion. And hey, let's be careful out there.

You've now read the rules. If you want to know what happens if you violate them, see "BANS," below.

OFF TOPIC POSTS

Off-topic posts are OK, unless they violate the rules as laid out above. We request that you put "OT" at the top of any posts that aren't related to Apple, its stock, or its competitors. Forgetting to use OT is not an offense that will get you banned. It will just make others shun you. ;-)

Please keep in mind that this forum is here to help people make better decisions about whether or not to invest in AAPL. But there is a kind of a collegial, dinner party atmosphere, and we do go off the reservation quite a bit.


BANS

Violators of the rules will usually receive a warning, and a second offense will probably result in a ban. In the case of especially egregious violations, a ban may come without warning.

When warranted, a ban may be imposed for being a general nuisance and/or generally disrupting civil discourse.

If you have been banned, but would like to be reinstated as a thread participant, it's simple, really. Send me a PM, agreeing to abide by the rules henceforth. The reinstatement will be conditional for ninety days, during which time the ban will be reinstated without warning if there are new infractions.

The above notwithstanding, the moderator reserves the right to keep a ban in place despite the user's request to have it rescinded, on a case by case basis.

All decisions about bans are made by the moderator, who serves at the pleasure of the participants of the thread. You may feel free to provide public or private feedback, which may or may not be heeded.

Fleshing out the anti-politics policy

Having conferred with Brad via PM, I want to clarify this board's policy with respect to political discussions.

If a political issue affects Apple as a company more than it would most companies, it's fair game for discussion here. A hypothetical example would be if Congress were debating a bill that would make it illegal for anyone to download any media file to more than one device. Clearly, Apple would be affected a lot more by the outcome of such a debate than would, say, IBM, Dell, HP, etc.

If a political issue affects the macro economy in some way, but doesn't affect Apple any more than it would any other company, it is not a topic for discussion here.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
213239[graphic] Here we go again! [graphic] Don't worry, this guy will show up Stock Puppy-last Friday
213238Was out most of the afternoon/evening so didn't get a chance to listen to thNAG12July 30
213237Never mind - that was peanuts. 340. [graphic]Stock Puppy1July 28
213236338 [graphic]Stock Puppy-July 28
213235Isn’t it time for Apple to split? 3/2 would nice..timmy’s last hurrahmanning181July 27
213234Dang... nicely done!! We missed out on the first two--took our first position inForce Majeure1July 18
213233Heywood, If I am remembering correctly, it wasn't just that they felt that NAG12July 18
213232I missed out on the 1987 stock split, but got in on the rest of them, for a totaHeywood403July 17
213231Oh yeah? Well when will Apple hit $363 again, huh? Huh? [graphic]Stock Puppy-July 17
213230I should note, the moderator of that board, to his credit, eventually acknowledgHeywood40-July 17
213229There's been an SI board dedicated to that line of thought since 2011... siHeywood401July 17
213228 irrationality of the valuation. Every time I hear that about Apple, Apple eveStock Puppy-July 17
213227Hey SP, Apple does seem a bit richly valued here. Even if Apple grows earnings NAG1-July 17
213226Oh dear - should we all run for the hills? Oh wait - close at 333.26. NevermiStock Puppy2July 16
213225Woo - woo! It's up there! [graphic]Stock Puppy-July 10
213224I thought their AI was broke or something. Now another new high or something. Stock Puppy-July 10
213223Actually, they use soldered in memory to improve performance.George W Bush-June 20
213222Apple raising prices, CEO says "we’ve been trying to shield our customersDoren-June 18
213221[graphic] Whee! And just for the heck of it: [graphic]Stock Puppy1June 9
213220If you have about 15 minutes, Marcus Brownlee has a review of the WWDC keynote NAG1-June 9
213219True for many with all tech, now. Some of it is data centers beginning to intruRon1June 9
213218Its not a hardware or software problem... its a matter of trust.Doren1June 9
213217Engineer, Seriously ? they are ALL about downloading info and doing it on a giaNAG1-June 8
213216Seriously ? they are ALL about downloading info and doing it on a giant bengineer-June 8
213215Hey Doren, Nice to see you are still around. All the stuff is supposed to hapNAG12June 8
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):