Research Frontiers Inc. - Moderated (REFR)

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Research Frontiers Inc. - Moderated (REFR)

An SI Board Since May 2004

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol	SI Sentiment
46	7	0	REFR	★★★★★ (Strong Buy)

Emcee: 613	Type: Moderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Moderated to remove only annoying posters that currently include one long (N. Dixon) and one short (gary schrimpf).

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
46	Now SPD has Raytheon's approval. Much more significant than a small Long Is	613	-	2/9/2007
45	No argument there! The only positive thing out of this annual meeting was the f	613	-	6/14/2005
44	<<But we still need someone to make the stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!>>> Yea	Area51	-	6/14/2005
43	Annual meeting coming up next week but I'm sure everyone that follows REFR a	613	-	6/2/2005
42	A REFR Haiku Forty years ago Robert Saxe saw the future Hoofnagle welfare	Bill Wexler	-	4/22/2005
41	Hey Bill, Glad to see someone posting to this board<g>! Will you admit yo	613	-	12/7/2004
40	<b>Update on the REFR stock fraud 12/3/2004</b> As many of you are	Bill Wexler	-	12/3/2004
39	Bink or Wexler? Results speak for themselves: Wexler 9/27/2001: <<<B	Bill Wexler	-	8/19/2004
38	The amazing BINK 8/10/2004 <<<I can not judge what the two people I m	Bill Wexler	-	8/19/2004
37	613, I can not judge what the two people I mentioned say here since I refuse to	BinkY2K	1	8/10/2004
36	Thank you for your interest in the REFR Moderated board. I see we have a wider	613	-	8/10/2004
35	Moderation? I took a look at SI and see this group has new messages. It claims	BinkY2K	-	8/10/2004
34	Wex: One for you - what's your comment on the recent large purchases of REF	613	-	7/27/2004
33	re: LaPointe. What are you getting at and why is he a target? He's only a P	613	-	7/27/2004
32	I must have missed this post. Here's the late response. <<Have you	613	-	7/27/2004
31	WANTED: information about Michael LaPointe To all REFR investors and interested	Bill Wexler	-	7/27/2004
30	<<Have you forwarded this info to the SEC?>> Yes. We also sent num	Bill Wexler	-	6/28/2004
29	1. re: scam/fraudulent. As long as you don't keep yelling it without other f	613	-	6/28/2004
28	<<If you want to have a discussion about REFR issue, let's leave the w	Bill Wexler	-	6/28/2004
27	>>The more relevant question is, is anyone seriously working to generate s	613	-	6/22/2004
26	<I>Management has no credibility - agreed. I would boot them in a second f	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	6/21/2004
25	I call it immoral and PR's were, IMO, deceptive but probably not illegal as	613	-	6/21/2004
24	<I>If you want to have a discussion about REFR issue, let's leave the	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	6/21/2004
23	FYI - I had a private email conversation with gschrimpf. I never read all his p	613	-	6/16/2004
22	If you want to have a discussion about REFR issue, let's leave the words fra	613	-	6/15/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):