SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
160983 921 6 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
160983The more things change, the more they stay the same...All prices remain artifactdvdw©-yesterday
160982I doubt APPL would use Q's RFFE, they would instead utilize Q's engineerTroubleT-yesterday
160981QCOM Q4F19- RFFE comments ………………………………………………………………. As reflected by the priJim Mullens6yesterday
160980WSJ "Keep Pressure on China Telecoms Over Unpaid Licensing Fees" wsj.Doug M.6yesterday
160979Shares of Qualcomm (QCOM) slipped on Monday after the company was downgraded tolml1yesterday
160978Morgan Stanley says : jump out the window. Institutional investors comply.Jon Koplik3yesterday
160977The Power of Combining 5G and AI Putting the two technologies together will chanBill Wolf2yesterday
160976Qualcomm's next flagship chipset to be unveiled early next month Alan FriedmBill Wolf2yesterday
160975Shares of Qualcomm (QCOM) slipped on Monday after the company was downgraded to Bill Wolf-yesterday
160974Ford seeks OK to test C-V2X using DSRC spectrum in California, Michigan by MonicBill Wolf2yesterday
160973Nokia is in line to pick up a share of China's lucrative 5G contracts after Bill Wolf1yesterday
160972Smartphone brands break records in first hours of Singles’ Day shopping festivalBill Wolf-yesterday
160971Analyst Actions: Morgan Stanley Downgrades Qualcomm to Equal-Weight From OverweiBill Wolf-yesterday
160970Probably not you, but that is an hysterically funny typo, It is Maui, Hawaii, pheilman_11yesterday
160969Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 set to launch early next month By Jeet On Nov 9, 2019 moVinnieBagOfDonuts3Sunday
160968Just a reminder regarding the Qualcomm NY Analyst Day presentation (from the Invryhack2Sunday
160967Sbfm, re: Newman’s Futurumresearch.com article...…………………….. "This quarterJim Mullens2Sunday
160966"This quarter was anchored by the licensing business seeing big revenue strsbfm2Sunday
160965futurumresearch.comlml3Sunday
160964Comparing MRVL and QCOM charts at 6 mo, YTD, 1 yr, 3 yr, and 5 yr time intervalsph571last Saturday
160963Right On. The Qualcomm train has left the station and he's missed it. He loimc1011last Saturday
160962Cramer is not a QCOM fan, and has not been since he sold his holdings out of hislml2last Saturday
160961Gawd I hate to be the person defending Cramer the clown as I like to call him. DaYooper1last Saturday
160960Historical daily share price chart and data for QUALCOMM since 1991 adjusted forvoop2last Friday
160959J., I noted that Jim Kelleher at Argus has now instituted a $110 price target, ryhack9last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):