SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
191124 1019 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
191124We have two of them. There are fine machines with very long battery lifetime. Thpheilman_-yesterday
191123Does anyone have an hands on experience with the Asus+ Snapdragon plus? Best BuyDan R-yesterday
191122Dangerous. ArtArt Bechhoefer-yesterday
191121Pairs trade would be to Short Broadcom and use the proceeds to go long Qualcommfreefromwires-yesterday
191120Just for fun I asked Copilot the following question: Dis regarding current markfreefromwires-last Friday
191119Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN) May 14,2024 Answers here: 3gpp.orgwaitwatchwander1last Friday
191118How much power does smartphone use to send to a GEO sat? What freq would be uswaitwatchwander2last Friday
191117Excellent reminder, thank you, regarding margin differential vs MTKvoop2last Friday
191116[graphic]Dan R5last Friday
191115I saw that headline at multiple sites, Did apple actually say three year role ouDr. John4last Friday
191114Engineer: what problems might Apple have getting carrier approval for this modemsbfm-last Friday
191113With Apple's new modem there is no mention of 5G SA nor an integrated chipsewaitwatchwander4last Friday
191112Does anyone think that QCOM will not be getting an increased royalty rate, or atOptntrdr19993last Friday
191111Furthermore, Qualcomm has been using AI for connectivity since the X70: qualcomWildbiftek1last Friday
191110Jim -- Many thanks for the estimates of total development costs for the inferiorArt Bechhoefer2last Friday
191109Somewhat OT: from this morning's NYT. Trump’s choice for Treasury is omatherandlowell-last Friday
191108All these articles do not mention that QCOM will not be standing still during ApPeter Petard6last Friday
191107My reply to the breaking news on Yahoo: Jay 2 minutes ago Exciting news fromatherandlowell5last Friday
191106Ben, /GR8, re: AAPL- designed 5G modem is coming...............................Jim Mullens5last Friday
191105just in time for talk of 6G technology (?)Jon Koplik3last Friday
191104HOPE-IUM: “Apple hopes to ultimately overtake Qualcomm’s technology by 2027, saiGR8FORM3last Friday
191103Gurman: Apple-designed 5G modem coming to 2025 iPhones will be worse than Qualcobenhorseman4last Friday
191102Apple Prepares Three-Year Modem Rollout to Outdo QualcommCompany plans first modbenhorseman5last Friday
191101Gift that keeps giving:Apple in-house modem to replace Qualcomm debuts next spriGR8FORM6last Friday
191100IPhone Maker Hon Hai Posts 3% Sales Growth After AI Demand Slows By Jane Lanhee Bill Wolf1last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):