We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
168455 948 6 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.


First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.


Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
168455China's EV market needs to consolidate. Qualcomm's likely enabled many waitwatchwander-4 hours ago
168454Sort of off topic, but it's a question that some people here may understand.Elroy-8 hours ago
168453Let’s see. Tailwinds for a positive earning surprise… 1) iPhone 13 selling a fuRightsaidfred29 hours ago
168452All you need to see is that Qualcomm, Microsoft, and Google, among others (not iJeffreyHF4yesterday
168451Really difficult to comprehend the ARM purchase by NVDA being a negative. On thRightsaidfred-yesterday
168450Qualcomm is excepted from this effort by the FTC to assert its anti-trust jurisdJeffreyHF19yesterday
168449The FTC creates a potential new US headache for SEP owners Both SEP owners and Bill Wolf2yesterday
168448(Pay Wall) US, China staking out strong positions in possible 6G technologies, Bill Wolf3yesterday
168447Qualcomm’s Mark Snyder Headlines IPWatchdog LIVE Day 2: ‘The U.S. Needs a New InBill Wolf9yesterday
168446Thanks for the "proof of life" post. Hope you've weathered time weJeffreyHF1yesterday
168445Glad to see QCOM is on your favorite stock list now Eric L. Hope you didn'tDaYooper2yesterday
168444Cabals and Cartels ... << Where there was Tero, there was finnophile EriEric L-Saturday
168443Hard to say what's happening with GM but it's hard to believe they'dwaitwatchwander-Saturday
168442Off Topic…..Fantastic Read…………
168441If it is a material involvement with Evergreen it would have already been discloRightsaidfred1Saturday
168440It seems Qualcomm was deeply involved with Evergrande's EV aspirations. Xiaowaitwatchwander1Saturday
168439Qualcomm excels in battery life. Can Nuvia ride to the CPU rescue?JeffreyHF2Saturday
168438Interesting article, but I think there's no causation. In the past quarter, JeffreyHF4Saturday
168437Does Qualcomm or their venture arm hold any Evergrande bonds or equity in any ofwaitwatchwander-Saturday
168436Qualcomm vs Intel vs AMD Chromebook: A detailed comparison Snip>>> Jim Mullens-Saturday
168435Rivos- Chip off the old Block ..................................>>>>Jim Mullens2Saturday
168434Bill, re: TSMC Faces Order Cutback ............................. Thanks for theJim Mullens-Saturday
168433GlobalFoundries Signs Qualcomm Deal And Shows Why There’s More To Silicon Than NJim Mullens2Saturday
168432Thanks for that. The related article about Rivos is especially interesting. Let&JeffreyHF6Saturday
168431MOBILE Apple CPU Gains Grind To A Halt And The Future Looks Dim As The Impact FrTHE WATSONYOUTH7last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):