We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
159353 915 5 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.


First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.


Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
159353I am not familiar with XMM, but bullish on QCOM.benhorseman-23 minutes ago
159352Ben, I wonder if you agree the Market desire to dump XMM- containing iPhones is frmrVZguy-an hour ago Apple Upgraded Ahead of Earnings The bullish news this week benhorseman1an hour ago
159350EUTC result from 7/20 is PROOF of QCOM litigation brilliance and assurance to shfrmrVZguy13 hours ago Qualcomm’s Mollenkopf on Its Anti-Trust Battle and the Rise of 5G: benhorseman34 hours ago
159348Forbes Report is Macroeconomic preview of 3Q19: Pres Xi advances Fin Reform - defrmrVZguy-4 hours ago
159347Samsung's Supersized 5G Future: Rumored 6.7-Inch Galaxy Note 10 Plus 5G Vs 6Bill Wolf-6 hours ago
159346What you need to know about the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ A mid-season refresh isBill Wolf-6 hours ago
159345Did anyone really expect that the FTC to not respond and reject DOJ and DOD/DOE&TroubleT5yesterday
159344Here are some of the Negative Headlines that may lower Qualcomm Rating, especialbenhorseman-yesterday
159343Beautiful ! Love it ! I also believe that Q cannot / should not fight screwed edwin k.-yesterday
159342<i>VBOD, after you read the FTC’s opposition to Q’s motion to stay pendingTHE WATSONYOUTH-yesterday
159341SCOTUS Summer Recess, 5G TightSpots too hot, and Maurice ultra vires Naughty BitfrmrVZguy-yesterday
159340Verizon wants you to pay $650 plus $85 a month for a 5G hotspot If Verizon chargBill Wolf-yesterday
159339At the time Congress invented the dopey Sherman anti-trust ideology, my grandfaMaurice Winn1yesterday
159338So much for a free market based on supply n demandDa Rookie-yesterday
159337................Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin will also attend the White HouBill Wolf-yesterday
159336No, Qualcomm can appeal straight to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court can Maurice Winn1yesterday
159335Qualcomm doesn't need to be immune to laws. It's that the judges and juMaurice Winn18yesterday
159334UPDATE 2-White House to host meeting with tech executives on Huawei ban -sourcestemco2-yesterday
159333Well mmW will have higher hear dissipation than Sub-6GHz. However, the way JoannSilcon Observer1yesterday
1593325G Phones Overheating lightreading.comwaitwatchwander-last Friday
159331VBOD, after you read the FTC’s opposition to Q’s motion to stay pending appeal, Cantfigureitout-last Friday FTC Fires Back at DOJ Over Qualcomm CompetitionJustice Department'sbenhorseman-last Friday
159329---> Qualcomm spends more on stock buybacks and dividends than it does on R&waitwatchwander7last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):