SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
200969 1106 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
200969Qualcomm Introduces $300 Laptops With Snapdragon C, Outruns Intel N250 by Up to voop43 hours ago
200968Slightly OT: Departing Judge Alan Albright urges US Congress to fix Section 101 waitwatchwander-5 hours ago
200967Gee, for a company fighting to survive with $1B in liquid cash it sure has a gigwaitwatchwander-6 hours ago
200966Yes, all that is right. As well, I believe the Modular deal was valued when thewaitwatchwander16 hours ago
200965Sorry - ARM is the only significant liquid asset Softbank hasOptntrdr1999-7 hours ago
200964Optntrdr- SoftBanks assets …………………...............................………………………….. Jim Mullens28 hours ago
200963You could also say it was Qualcomm wanting Modular to assume some of the risk anfreefromwires88 hours ago
200962I am not sure ARM and Softbank have any exit avenues other than a spectacular loOptntrdr199938 hours ago
200961I think there is a high parallel between nvidia/cuda and all Qualcomm solutions engineer39 hours ago
200960knowing this, I would take a very tough stand if I were CA. thanks for the insigengineer19 hours ago
200959Voop, re: Modular – all stock deal…………………………………………..............................Jim Mullens-9 hours ago
200958www, re: QCOM v ARM- out of court settlement /or not ..........................Jim Mullens312 PM
200957newly issued or treasury shares - has the same dilutive effectOptntrdr1999-11 AM
200956VOOP: Gemini states the share were newly issued, private placement: Qualcomm coGR8FORM311 AM
200955Your article stated the purchase of Modular was an all stock deal.. Did not reavoop-10 AM
200954Mojo Hits 1.0 — Two Weeks After Qualcomm Bought the Company Behind It how2shoutwaitwatchwander-8 AM
200953Akash: archive.fast-edgar.comBill Wolf18 AM
200952I agree with it being time for consequences. That will likely require the lawyewaitwatchwander4yesterday
200951i think consequences are necessary ( in both ARM and Apple) to insure that 3 yeaengineer16yesterday
200950HF -- A "mere" $10 billion judgment, for example, is less likely than Art Bechhoefer1yesterday
200949www, Re: QCOM v ARM- Arm bankruptcy is not an issue--- resolved.in structured dJim Mullens2yesterday
200948Art, Wall St does not reward monetary judgements but does reward judgements thathedgefund2yesterday
200947QCOM v. ARM is set for trial in early October. The whole point of the lawsuit iArt Bechhoefer2yesterday
200946As much as I understand and support the 'best engineering wins' mindset Jeff Vayda13yesterday
200945I guess I should have been clearer and stated it as money from Arm. As others hwaitwatchwander1yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):