We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
177523 975 6 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.


First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.


Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
177523Why Chinese AI and semiconductors could fall decades behind under US chip ban ‘bBill Wolf-14 minutes ago
177522Has the Optis v. Apple case been overruled? There are strong indications that isbfm-yesterday
177521Qualcomm Faces Inventory Headwinds, Morgan Stanley 1:35 PM ET, 02/03/2023 - MT Bill Wolf1yesterday
177520Qualcomm still hurt by elevated inventory and soft handset demand, but a bottom Bill Wolf1yesterday
177519Cite? I understood that if a company refused to take a license offered on fair sbfm2yesterday
177518Runs afoul of FRAND.Qurious1yesterday
177517Here is my "no cap for Apple" analysis. (I am not an IP expert.) 1. Tsbfm3yesterday
177516Yes, hiring the fellow and then promoting him up the ranks just goes to show howwaitwatchwander1last Friday
177515I don't post often but it behoves me to comment on the brilliance of the anaAnother John14last Friday
177514.......can you imagine if this Murphy guy had won out over CA for Q CEO?.....jusTHE WATSONYOUTH-last Friday
177513Well at least this year Qualcomm employees got a review of their performance at waitwatchwander1last Friday
177512Qualcomm Stock Rises. The Company Is Diversifying Away From Smartphones and ApplBill Wolf1last Friday
177511Nice to see Nextwave still kicking and putting their spectrum holdings to work, waitwatchwander1last Friday
177510<i> the buybacks simply served to offset employee share based awards.</THE WATSONYOUTH-last Friday
177509apple is trying to get their own modem by 2026 latest is for that simple reason peaceforme2last Friday
177508I have heard similar things about cheap chips for auto makers. Many are analog tSilcon Observer1last Friday
177507Interesting point on the cap not holding when there is no contract. How do youSilcon Observer2last Friday
177506<i>So explain AMD?</i> center performance relative to IntTHE WATSONYOUTH1last Friday
177505The games are all well known. Mucho experience in dealing with them has also bewaitwatchwander4last Friday
177504QCOM Air, the only company providing flights on Mars, will have its next flight sbfm2last Friday
177503He didn't say Q won't be owed royalties. He said Apple would stop payingsbfm-last Friday
177502AAPL may stop paying royalties to QCOM around this time—which could potentially waitwatchwander3last Friday
177501(repeating an old post) Re : big buttons in your message : A memorable quotatioJon Koplik-last Friday
177500Barons: Qualcomm Stock Rises. The Company Is Diversifying Away From SmartphonesGR8FORM5last Friday
177499right off the bat, this guy is mistaken. TI is running out of control and catersengineer9last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):