SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   PastimesRage Against the Machine


Previous 10 Next 10 
From: Thomas M.5/11/2022 8:40:48 PM
of 1296
 
Noam Chomsky:

"There is one Western statesman of stature who has made a sensible statement about how you can solve the Ukraine crisis. His name is Donald J. Trump."

Tom

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Thomas M.6/1/2022 8:48:25 PM
of 1296
 
The 2016 timeline:

1) July 28 --- CIA Director John Brennan briefed Obama on a plan approved by Hillary Clinton on July 26 to “vilify Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.”

2) September 7 --- the CIA referred to Strzok and Comey the investigative matter involving a purported plan by Hillary concerning blaming Trump for Russian hackers “as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email

3) September 19 --- Sussmann, a lawyer for Clinton’s campaign who claimed not to be representing any client, brings FBI GC Baker data and white papers accusing Trump of having a secret back channel communications link with the Kremlin through Alfa Bank

4) September 20 --- FBI Agent Hellman concludes that the narrative does not hold water. And he suspected that the data were created to sell a narrative rather than something found accidentally by researchers.

Given the CIA's referral and the FBI analyst's suspicions, why didn’t the FBI 7th Floor launch an investigation of Hillary as the possible sponsor of a hoax? And why did the 7th Floor instead open a full counter-intelligence investigation by Chicago Field Office into the Alfa Bank narrative being spun by Sussmann, Joffe and friends?

twitter.com

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Thomas M.6/22/2022 12:12:41 PM
of 1296
 
The Great Reset is about creating a hard authoritarian core for democracy: policies, offices, and funding that are completely beyond the reach of voters. It's not a new idea, as you can see from issues like immigration and "green energy." Voters have zero input on either.

twitter.com

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Thomas M.6/27/2022 12:29:46 PM
of 1296
 
Clarence Thomas: Expanding The Administrative State Comes At The Expense Of The Constitution
Clarence Thomas: "There’s very little major legislation that comes from the legislature. The legislation comes in the form of regulations from agencies. They tend to have all three powers. They have the executive power, the enforcement power, they have administrative judges to adjudicate, so they have all three. And the question for us is, where do they fit in the constitutional structure?

When a private right is somehow intruded upon by one of these agencies, what is the role of the federal courts? If we simply defer to the agencies, which is what we do now, in many cases, aren’t we doing precisely what happened when it came to the royal courts of the pre-Revolutionary era? How does that make us any different? You’ve got this creation that sits over here outside the Constitution, or beyond the Constitution. How does it fit within our constitutional structure? How’s it limited and what is the risk that it will actually vitiate the constitutional protections that we have?"
Michael Pack: "I think it was James Madison who said that if you combine the executive, legislative, and judicial in one person, or branch, it’s the very definition of tyranny."
thefederalist.com

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Thomas M.7/1/2022 4:26:37 PM
of 1296
 
George Washington:
It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.

Taking care always to keep ourselves, by suitable establishments, on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.
en.wikisource.org

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


From: Thomas M.7/3/2022 7:48:26 PM
of 1296
 
$40 billion Ukraine aid bill will produce at least $17 billion in revenue for US military contractors.

Democrats voted unanimously in both the House and Senate to approve the bill. All the opposing votes came from Republicans. Not even Bernie Sanders opposed the measure.

jacobinmag.com

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Thomas M.7/28/2022 5:40:27 PM
of 1296
 


Tom

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Thomas M.8/16/2022 3:36:04 PM
of 1296
 
Do you want free speech to thrive? Then it has to be regulated, now more than ever

theguardian.com

A more perfectly Orwellian headline is not possible.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Thomas M.9/4/2022 11:26:26 AM
of 1296
 
Trump is a surgeon excising cancerous tumors from our body politic.



Tom

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Thomas M.9/6/2022 10:39:24 PM
of 1296
 
If Biden wins, that's going to be the power structure:

A Democratic Party fully united with Neocons, Bush/Cheney operatives, CIA/FBI/NSA, Wall Street, and Silicon Valley - presenting itself as the only protection against fascism.

And much of the left will continue marching behind it.
Accurate prediction from October 2020.

twitter.com

Tom

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10