• Big Pharma wants the massive, steady revenue stream of mRNA vaccines
• any effective treatment of Covid would discourage vaccine acceptance
• hence, all treatments must be suppressed

1. We’ve known it works since August 24, 2020. That is when the phase 2 results were published. Since FLV is a safe drug, it should have been widely discussed with patients that there is virtually no downside and a huge reduction in hospitalization if the drug is given early. Every earlier study of fluvoxamine (such as observational studies) showed it work and the mechanism had been shown. Once the Phase 2 result came out, it should have been embraced by doctors. The medical community did nothing (with a few exceptions like Dr. Seftel).
   
   
2. The infectious disease scientists lied to me. They all promised me when fluvoxamine passed Phase 3 trials, nearly everyone would use it. That was a lie. Pretty much nothing changed when the Phase 3 trial confirmed fluvoxamine worked. . Fluvoxamine was reportedly added to just 2 practice guidelines. Medicine isn’t about saving lives anymore. Those days are gone.
   
   
3. Government agencies are ignoring the science. NIH and WHO refuse to acknowledge it works since it will cause vaccine hesitancy if it is known that there is a drug that turns COVID into a mild disease. That’s why they didn’t change their recommendation when the Phase 3 trial was published in Lancet. I fully expected both organizations to do absolutely nothing. They knew in advance it was coming and on the day the paper was published they ignored it entirely.
   
   
4. Lack of action. All this was known back in January 2021 when a key opinion leader panel of experts from NIH, CDC, FDA, academia, and journal editors voted by over 2:1 to recommend that fluvoxamine be recommended to physicians to discuss with patients. All the medical journals refused to publish the meeting notes (rejected by 6 journals).
   
   

''I think it is the beginning of a new cold war. I think the Russians will gradually react quite adversely and it will affect their policies. I think it is a tragic mistake. There was no reason for this whatsoever. No one was threatening anybody else. This expansion would make the Founding Fathers of this country turn over in their graves. We have signed up to protect a whole series of countries, even though we have neither the resources nor the intention to do so in any serious way. [NATO expansion] was simply a light-hearted action by a Senate that has no real interest in foreign affairs.''

''What bothers me is how superficial and ill informed the whole Senate debate was,'' added Mr. Kennan, who was present at the creation of NATO and whose anonymous 1947 article in the journal Foreign Affairs, signed ''X,'' defined America's cold-war containment policy for 40 years. ''I was particularly bothered by the references to Russia as a country dying to attack Western Europe. Don't people understand? Our differences in the cold war were with the Soviet Communist regime. And now we are turning our backs on the very people who mounted the greatest bloodless revolution in history to remove that Soviet regime."

By helping its Sunni allies provide weapons to al Nusra Front and its allies and by funneling into the war zone sophisticated weapons that were bound to fall into al Nusra hands or strengthen their overall military position, U.S. policy has been largely responsible for having extended al Qaeda’s power across a significant part of Syrian territory.