We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Technology StocksBLUEPOINT LINUX (BLPT), the RED HAT of CHINA??....

Previous 10 Next 10 
To: StkProfit$ who wrote (32)3/30/2000 12:55:00 PM
From: jim0z0
   of 58
I think we will see good things from Bluepoint as the relationships it is developing now, and the business turf they have claimed, mature.

As is stated on bluepoint's web site, the two main markets the company is focusing on are computer users and the embedded market.

Perhaps we will see deals with major hardware or chip manufacturers in the Chinese market down the road.

A- The short-term market of the BluePoint Linux product depends on the number of the Chinese Linux users, mostly computer professionals and enthusiasts.
B- Embedded Linux Market - Mobile phone sales figures are much higher than that of PCs and the embedded equipment market is 10 times larger than the PC market.

The future of Bluepoint looks very bright over the mid and long haul.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: jim0z0 who wrote (33)4/1/2000 5:18:00 PM
From: Boomba007
   of 58
Well, great buying prices right now...

Been buying... & Buying more....

Good lUck


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Rolla Coasta who wrote ()4/26/2000 2:21:00 PM
From: CSage
   of 58
Intel and Bluepoint to Establish Linux Technical Support Center in China

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 26, 2000--Bluepoint Linux Software Corp. (OTCBB:BLPT) announced today that the company will join forces with Intel (Nasdaq:INTC) to establish a Linux Technical Support Center in China.

According to Yu Deng, President of Bluepoint, Intel will contribute technology and equipment, and Bluepoint will deliver the management and staffing and operate the center.

The center, located in Shenzhen, is comprised of the following units: Proof of Concept (POC), Online Support, Training and Call center. The center will deliver services to integration providers, Linux solution providers and end users. From the POC center, staff experts will evaluate client business requirements and objectively recommend the most suitable software solution.

Bluepoint's Online Support Center utilizes Knowledge Base and Virtual Community to provide online technical support. Visitors can quickly and conveniently find technical information in the Knowledge Base and can get online, real time support from Linux experts.

Mr. Yu Deng, the President of Bluepoint, said: "The lack of reliable technical support and the lack of high quality Linux solutions that meet the need of the Chinese market have been a bottle-neck in the Linux development in China. Bluepoint founders have been paying close attention to the technical support problem. In 1998, Bluepoint founders established the first Linux/Unix support site in China: We are confident that, with the support from Intel, the Bluepoint's Linux Technical Support will help to push the Linux development in China to new levels."

Bluepoint Linux Software is the developer of the first "true Chinese" Linux operating system, named Bluepoint. Bluepoint controls approximately 80 percent of the Chinese Linux bundling market and is preinstalled by several major computer manufacturers in China, including Great Wall, TCL and Xiahua Shanbao (TriGem).

The company is a leading provider of Linux solutions and related services in the Chinese market. The company also develops Linux-based embedded systems.

Forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, continued acceptance of the company's products and technological changes, the company's dependence upon third-party suppliers, intellectual-property rights and other risks detailed from time to time in the company's periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Bluepoint Linux Software Corp., Shenzhen, China

Yu Deng, 011-86-755-376-2651


The Pace Communications Network

Simon Em, 800/791-5777


BW0077 APR 26,2000

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: CSage who wrote (35)5/23/2000 10:43:00 PM
From: naband
   of 58
Anybody still here? House of Representatives will vote on PNTR tomorrow, the 24th. Could trigger an upside move. Any thoughts?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Rolla Coasta who wrote ()5/24/2000 7:23:00 PM
From: naband
   of 58
House approves PNTR Bill - Next stop Senate! EOM

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Rolla Coasta who wrote ()5/24/2000 7:32:00 PM
From: naband
   of 58
My personal target for BLPT has been raised to $25.00 EOM

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: naband who wrote (38)3/3/2001 11:05:32 PM
From: naband
   of 58
It appears my exuberance of the Spring was misplaced. The China syndrome has certainly faded. Still holding, but $25 seems to be far off. Company has potential to be successful - but margins are tight. What we consider reasonable growth here would be tremendous for China. I'll keep my fingers crossed and check back at year's end. Any other opinions out there?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Rolla Coasta who started this subject9/11/2002 4:49:57 PM
From: SEC-ond-chance
   of 58
Bluepoint Linux Software Corp · S-8 · On 12/15/0 · EX-5
SEC File 333-51890 · Accession Number 1058985-0-264

EX-5 · Opinion re: Legality

Shawn F. Hackman, a P.C.
3360 West Sahara Avenue
Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89102
(702) 732-2253

Date: December 12th, 2000

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

Re: Bluepoint Linux Software Corp. Employee Benefit Plan.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as counsel to Bluepoint Linux Software Corp, an Indiana
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with its Registration Statement on
Form S-8 relating to the registration of 400,000 shares of its common stock
(the "Shares"), $0.001 par value per share. The Shares are issuable pursuant
to the Company's Employee Benefit Plan (the "Plan").

In our representation we have examined such documents, corporate records, and
other instruments as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for purposes of
this opinion, including, but not limited to, the Articles of Incorporation
and Bylaws of the Company.

Based upon the foregoing, it is our opinion that the Company is duly organized
and validly existing as a corporation under the laws of the State of Indiana,
and that the Shares, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms of the
Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid, and non-assessable.We hereby consent
to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.

Shawn F. Hackman, a P.C.

By:/s/Adam U. Shaikh, Esq.
Adam U. Shaikh, Esq.

Litigation Release 16233/ August 2, 1999

SEC v. Kanakaris Communications, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. CV-S-99-0967-JBR-LRL.

The Commission announced that on August 2, 1999, it filed a complaint seeking permanent injunctions against Kanakaris Communications, Inc. ("KCI"), Alexander Frank Kanakaris ("Kanakaris"), David R. Valenti ("Valenti") and Shawn F. Hackman ("Hackman"), alleging violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17 (a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule l0b-5 thereunder. The Commission's complaint also seeks disgorgement from Hackman and civil penalties against Kanakaris, Valenti and Hackman. KCI, Kanakaris and Valenti have agreed to settle the action by consenting, without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint, to be enjoined from future violations of the registration and antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws; Kanakaris and Valenti also have agreed to pay civil money penalties of $25,000 each.

The complaint alleges that from January 1997 through January 1998, Kanakaris and Valenti both officers of KCI, fraudulently sold the securities of KCI and its predecessor company to individuals in several states. In soliciting investments, it is alleged Kanakaris and Valenti made misrepresentations regarding KCI's financial condition and operations. It is also alleged that Kanakaris and Valenti misrepresented to investors that KCI had a joint venture agreement with Microsoft Corporation. Some of these misrepresentations were allegedly also posted on KCI's web site.

In addition, it is alleged that Hackman, a Las Vegas attorney, prepared a false offering memorandum for KCI, sold KCI stock using the offering memorandum, and collected and distributed the proceeds of those sales, retaining a substantial portion of those funds for his own use. It is further alleged that Hackman, without authorization from KCI, prepared and filed a registration statement with the Commission which, among other things, misrepresented the shareholdings of KCI's management and major shareholders, stated that no unregistered offerings of KCI's securities had been made within the previous year and, rather than including audited financial statements, contained a review of KCI's financial statements without obtaining the consent of the accountants who prepared the review.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (40)9/11/2002 4:50:56 PM
From: SEC-ond-chance
   of 58
Issue 2002-176
September 11, 2002

The Commission has issued an Order of Suspension against Shawn F.Hackman of Las Vegas, Nevada, suspending him forthwith from appearing orpracticing before the Commission based on his disbarment by the SupremeCourt of Nevada. In taking its action against Hackman, the Court foundthat Hackman had misappropriated over $700,000 in client funds at a timewhen he was ostensibly cooperating with bar counsel concerningallegations by other clients that Hackman had misappropriated theirfunds as well.Hackman is currently a defendant in SEC v. Kanakaris Communications,Inc. In that action, the Commission has alleged that Hackman violatedSection 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and....

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (4)

To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (41)9/12/2002 11:37:10 AM
From: StockDung
   of 58
In the Matter of SHAWN F. HACKMAN, ESQ.

Before the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Release No. 46478 / September 11, 2002
Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-10887


In the Matter of


TO RULE 102(e)(2) OF THE


The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it appropriate that an Order of Suspension be issued against Shawn F. Hackman ("Hackman") pursuant to paragraph (2) of Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.102(2)] ("Rule 102(e)").1


The Commission finds that:

A. Hackman is an attorney and was licensed to practice law in the State of Nevada on October 16, 1996.

B. On August 2, 1999, the Commission filed a complaint (the "Complaint") in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada against Kanakaris Communications, Inc. ("KCI") and others, including Hackman. The Complaint alleges, among other things, that Hackman violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by: (1) preparing a false offering memorandum for KCI; (2) selling KCI stock using the offering memorandum; (3) collecting and distributing the proceeds of those sales while retaining $333,645 of those funds for his own use; and (4) without authorization from KCI, preparing and filing a materially misleading registration statement with the Commission. The Commission is seeking a permanent injunction, disgorgement and civil penalties against Hackman.

C. On April 13, 2002, the Supreme Court of Nevada barred Hackman from practicing law in that state based on findings that Hackman had misappropriated over $700,000 in client funds at a time when he was ostensibly cooperating with bar counsel concerning allegations by other clients that Hackman had misappropriated their funds as well. In Re Discipline of Shawn F. Hackman (No. 38826).


Based upon the foregoing, the Commission finds that Hackman has been disbarred from the practice of law within the meaning of Rule 102(e)(2) of the Commission's Rules of Practice. The Commission deems it appropriate and accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Hackman be forthwith suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an attorney.

By the Commission.

Jonathan G. Katz

1 Rule 102(e)(2) provides in pertinent part: "Any attorney who has been suspended or disbarred by a court of the United States or of any State … shall be forthwith suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission. A disbarment … within the meaning of this section shall be deemed to have occurred when the disbarring . . . agency or tribunal enters its judgment or order .…"

Home | Previous Page Modified: 09/12/2002

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10