We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Eric1/30/2024 5:28:33 PM
   of 23912

With gas phase-out in view, Europe could lose $160 billion in fuel taxes

Credit: Tesla Manufacturing/X

By Zachary Visconti
Posted on January 30, 2024

With Europe’s gas phase-out plans now within view, the countries there could be set to lose significant funding from fuel taxes in the coming years.

Last year, the European Union (EU) officially approved a mandate to end the sale of new gas cars by 2035, in order to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and slow down the warming of Earth’s atmosphere. Still, the change could have some latent effects, especially as most countries get crucial revenue from taxes on gas.

In 2023, the top five economies in Europe earned over €150 billion ($163 billion) in fuel levies, representing as much as 2 percent of the countries’ total taxes, according to Bloomberg. In the United Kingdom, gas and diesel duties are predicted to amount to £24.3 billion ($31 billion) between last year and this year—or more than alcohol and tobacco taxes combined.

Many of these taxes go toward important societal needs such as hospitals, schools, and road maintenance, highlighting the need for the income to continue, even as electric vehicles (EVs) take over the market in the coming years. Instead of allowing this revenue to disappear as battery-electrics become the new norm, it might be time to start planning for replacement options now.

There are multiple potential options for ensuring this revenue remains with the transition to EVs, including the fact that these sectors could generate funding elsewhere, like through income taxes. However, some also argue that this approach, not unlike the option of taxing car sales outright, wouldn’t account for how much a person uses their vehicle, potentially increasing congestion, and removing incentives to buy more efficient vehicles.

As such, taxing driving specifically may be a better alternative. Still, taxing electricity rates would require some houses to add meters for this purpose, and it may risk offering wealthier households, who can afford to install home-charging equipment, lower taxes than those charging at public charging stations. Add in the element of the increasing rollout of residential solar power, and this could even further exacerbate the issue.

Instead, taxing as fairly as possible on the actual road use would be ideal, which isn’t unlike many areas’ use of toll roads. Whether using annual checkups and registration practices to determine how many miles a given vehicle drives per year, or using something else like GPS, this approach seems like it could offer a more level playing field across socioeconomic lines.

In any case, beginning to consider these options now will be imperative for government officials to avoid losing this funding in the future, and delaying this process could result in a tougher transition period.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext