Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
43377 242 8 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": Hierarchy if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
43377Thank you for your candid reply.jargonweary-an hour ago
43376I mistaken. Will post the original in the later.GCowan-an hour ago
43375I have made the find of a video which greatly explains the science behind immu-1GCowan-2 hours ago
43374Given the stock price, which is indicative of shareholders confidence, I would sgary12323 hours ago
43373My guess is traders not wanting to be short going into the weekend. I for one aTinfoilHat14 hours ago
433721.5 million shares traded after hours. Comments. nasdaq.comdorightbythem-8 hours ago
43371why would you think DrG and MsS would find Corzines con appalling? Maybe you misduwhee-yesterday
43370Once again, sticking as close as I can to the terms of use here, I will restrainjargonweary-yesterday
43369That is keeping with an excellent analysis. Have you a background in medicine? IGCowan-yesterday
43368Gary, find one post of mine where I advocated for a deal in 2013 for a $40 milliFitzhughlaw9yesterday
43367Thank you, mrc.kdd999-yesterday
43366They are targeting a different cell type. Clear cell carcinoma. Urothelial cancemrc7581yesterday
43365Since you've strained mightily to find anything in my previous post, given mgary123-yesterday
43364Anybody know how similar Aveo's kidney drug is to 132? Nice day for them onkdd999-yesterday
43363<<and license the agent in 2013>> Nor ANY agent in 2009, 2010, 2011idahoranch13yesterday
43362I can only think of two people on earth who could be gary123s real identity. Thkdd999-yesterday
43361Redmile Group LLC bought a new position in shares of Immunomedics, Inc. (NASDAQ:sysiphus3yesterday
43360So is it your opinion that IMMU shareholders would be better off having Doc and jargonweary-yesterday
43359Well, can we get, at least a modicum of an analysis on the future prospects of igary123-yesterday
43358Gary, when I read your posts that strain mightily to find something -- ANYTHING jargonweary3yesterday
43357Gary, You have some interesting theories on why each move in IMMU happens, and bobbseytwins20015yesterday
43356Yeah, Gary. And Captain Smith's piloting of the Titanic into that iceberg ulFitzhughlaw11yesterday
43355The fact is since VB took power there has been no clinical updates to drive the gary123-yesterday
43354I don't really disagree with your post. All I'm saying is I've seen Vanderm_98-yesterday
43353I'm in Erick's camp in that a lot of the short position has probably plaidahoranch11yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.