SI
SI
discoversearch

Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
44953 278 23 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": Hierarchy if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at siliconinvestor.com and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Erick
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
44953Good point! Maybe "market opportunity" equates to revenue opportunity?patlawche11-yesterday
44952Actually I think the phrase was "market opportunity". Is that the samesysiphus1yesterday
44951Let us take a relatively recently emergent antibody based commercial pharmaceutiSmoke Reader-yesterday
44950Yes, we like silly.weatherproof3yesterday
44949>The Health Advances study determined that if the current IMMU-132 clinical dpatlawche116yesterday
44948Thank you! Was searching our past posts, found your posts 41634, 41633 & 416sogwap1-yesterday
44947soggy - It was Health Advances, and any dilution wouldn't affect the market weatherproof5yesterday
44946I know the whole deal with Doc and SGEN still leaves a bad taste in my mouth butsogwap11yesterday
44945drtom -- one place to look for some sense of market cap valuation, and its a bitallatwwk1yesterday
44944I've been struggling with what appropriate expectations should be, as it seedrtom12346yesterday
44943I see it the same way ghettogoulash. The major risks are out of the way. The loallatwwk1Saturday
44942Personally, I do not see much downside risk here going into the AA decision, onlghettogoulash-Saturday
44941And more paper.... I just got my first copy of the 21 page "Notice of Pendeerickerickson-last Friday
44940Hopefully we'll see $40 again, I'll buy more than a Cadillac.sogwap13last Friday
44939Dear friends in immunomedics. I have been in this stock since 1998 originally bubill152last Friday
44938Yes, I think when you first caught the presser that outlined the terms of the agFitzhughlaw2last Thursday
44937And there's the part about Forrester, Aryeh, Cox, and Oliver (the new and imli3511-last Thursday
44936Good idea that it was your “last post on the matter”. You’re losing badly in thjargonweary1last Thursday
44935Turns out I misread Fitz's post and he kindly corrected me. Laster is _not_ erickerickson1last Thursday
44934I have showed my efforts as I'm the one who said did somebody file somethingTeetime-last Thursday
44933Everybody gets a pass on an occasional grumpy reply. I have very little time to duwhee5last Thursday
44932Tee: I'd started typing a reply, but then realized that to answer it all I erickerickson3last Thursday
44931Fitz: I'd forgotten (or missed) the part about V.C. Laster being the arbitrerickerickson4last Thursday
44930That deal would have been awful. I'm amazed anyone could even make that statsukit12last Thursday
44929 "Notice of Pendency and Proposed Partial Settlement of Stockholder DerivatFitzhughlaw10last Thursday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.