Foreign Policy Discussion Thread
An SI Board Since November 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
11976 71 0
Emcee:  Hawkmoon Type:  Moderated
Primary Rules:

1.) Keep it clean.
2.) Keep it as objective as possible.
3.) Keep it relatively civil.
4.) Try to kiss and make up after you eventually blow your top in a heated debate..

And most importantly...

5.) Remember it's only a debating thread, not the UN..

I like to put ideas out there for public consumption which I feel are logically supported by facts. I WANT others to analyze my views and indicate other perspectives which I should incorporate. I hope others adher to the same belief that, only through debating with facts, not just rhetoric, we can all gain a better understanding of how Foreign Policy is influenced by various factors.

Other than that, we should all welcome a lively debate representing all realistic and objective perspectives (no Chomskyites). But be prepared to defend your beliefs and opinions, just as I am, and include documentation and/or links ...

I certainly won't throw you into FADT "jail" merely for publicly calling into question something I say (so long as your response is logically supported by facts, even if incorrect)...

Current essays on Nationalism (My pet interest):

Message 18771510

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11976US vs China in Asia... worth a read ... nytimes.comkumar rangan1Tuesday
11975It's interesting reading Pakistani Media web sites : Dawn & Express Tribkumar rangan-last Saturday
11974My notes on Trump's Tariff speech, just prior to him signing the Tariff Execkumar rangan-March 8
11973So, now we have 4 trade blocs : NAFTA, EU, GCC, TPP ... Interestingly - Indoneskumar rangan-March 8
11972 Is a Russian Invasion of Kazakhstan on the Horizon? georgetownsecuritystudiesrteevee2March 7
11971Possibly. For example, IPSCO is a Canadian steel company, but American owned. Thteevee-March 5
11970Tariff exemptions by business, not country ? : reuters.comkumar rangan-March 4
11969What could China do in a US trade war? The article talks about tariffs on solar kumar rangan-March 4
11968A tariff on Canadian steel would not be good for Canada's Prime Minister, Mrteevee-March 4
11967[graphic]kumar rangan1March 4
11966about 40 years ago, when I was working at Reed Tool to earn money to pay my univteevee1March 3
11965<i>Perhaps Trump wants more US domestic content in DOD procurements?</ikumar rangan1March 2
11964I'm not going down the rat hole of DOD contractors, sub contractors etc. wokumar rangan1March 2
11963DOD orders 3% of needed steel from domestic suppliers. What about DOD contractteevee1March 2
11962Media reports say - DOD orders 3% of needed steel from domestic suppliers.kumar rangan1March 2
11961US steel and aluminum tariffs? The real reason must be that domestic production teevee1March 2
11960Op-Ed in Pakistani media, worth a read : rangan1March 1
11959FATF & Pakistan : After reading various confusing & sometimes contradikumar rangan1February 24
11958Global watchdog to put Pakistan back on terrorist financing watch list : sourceskumar rangan-February 23
11957Ok.. granted that it might be twice as quick as shipping, but show me ANY train Hawkmoon-February 1
11956The new Silk Road : [youtube video]kumar rangan-February 1
11955For CPEC (China Pakistan Economic Corridor) & OBOR (One Belt One Road) relatkumar rangan1January 31
11954Speaking of "big money", China is also filling the vacuum behind the Uteevee1January 30
11953I don't know the author personally, but a couple of my friends do, which is Hawkmoon-January 30
11952Hawk, Great article. This is the sort of journalism that is lacking at home. It teevee1January 30
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2018 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.