SI
SI
discoversearch

Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
137477 910 1 QCOM
Emcee:  slacker711 Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.


This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
137477Verizon, Ericsson, and Qualcomm eclipse previous record with Gigabit LTE speeds Bill Wolf-an hour ago
137476 Some slides at link. guru3d.com Five years ago, as we at Qualcomm Datacenteslacker711-an hour ago
137475 Anandtech's take on Centriq. I dont understand the server market nearly weslacker711-an hour ago
137474Jello thanks. 3rd post already. ..1st was yesterday. Good to see Mike expandiJim Mullens-2 hours ago
137473New item? >> Samsung locks up the Snapdragon 845 for the Galaxy S9 teMETMAN-3 hours ago
137472 The best explanation I've read of the AAPL v QCOM issues. Reposting in caseJello23 hours ago
137471Slacker, more on Hot Chips..................................... semiwiki.com Jim Mullens-6 hours ago
137470 Many more details about Centriq at the link. theregister.co.uk Qualcomm moveslacker71158 hours ago
137469Handset supply chain makers on high alert as smartphone competition looming MonBill Wolf-6 AM
137468Qualcomm to extend tie-up with TSMC to FinFET, says executive Josephine Lien, SBill Wolf36 AM
137467Meizu M6 Note Seen On Geekbench With Snapdragon 625 gizmochina.comBill Wolf-6 AM
137466Mike Freeman article in today's San Diego Union-Tribune > SDUT articleJello-yesterday
137465QCOM should have, but did **not** license its chipset competitors--- believing tslacker711-yesterday
137464Clash of 2 tech titans- What Apple and Qualcomm are really fighting about......Jim Mullens7yesterday
137463Jeffrey/ hedge, re: judge kohs ruling................... ..thanks for your insiJim Mullens-yesterday
137462Jim, if it is helpful you may wish to understand the legal process involved in ahedgefund4yesterday
137461Jim, the court did not have before it a Motion For Summary Disposition testing tJeffreyHF3yesterday
137460N.Novak, re: Good Overview of Q Claims..................................... Jim Mullens-yesterday
137459District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss FTC Section 5 Complaint Against QualcommJim Mullens-yesterday
137458I see Apple as the Frankenstein monster that Qualcomm created. Most of Apple'JeffreyHF15yesterday
137457Good Overview of Q Claims law360.comN.Novick-yesterday
137456The first tweet also states that they are arguing over $4 billion in missing payslacker7113yesterday
137455Great find. Scott Graham observed that Curiel set a trial date for next Fall, whJeffreyHF-yesterday
137454Why Your Face Will Soon Be the Key to All Your Devices Better-than-ever face-reBill Wolf1yesterday
137453Scott Graham reporter @ law.com twitter.comBill Wolf5yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.